Comedy Gold: Flashback--Newbie Senator Obama on Governing
Listening to the newbie Senator Obama pontificate about how Republicans "ought" to be governing is pure comedy gold.
Obama: "My understanding of the Senate is is that you need 60 votes to get something to happen, which means the Democrats and Republicans have to ask the question, do we have, uh, the will to move an American agenda forward, not a Democratic or Republican agenda forward. . . .
"The bottom line is that our health care plans are similar; the bottom line is, who can get it done. Who can build a movement for change? This is an area where we're going to have to have a 60% majority in the Senate and the House in order to actually get a bill to my desk. We're gonna have to have a majority in order to get a bill to my desk. That is not just a fifty plus one majority. . . .
"You've got to break out of, what I call, sort of, the fifty plus one pattern of presidential politics. Maybe you eke out a victory of fifty plus one. Then you can't govern. You know, you get an Air Force One, I mean there are a lot of nice perks, but you can't, you can't deliver on health care. We're not going to pass universal health care with a fifty plus one strategy. . . .
"Those big ticket items, big ticket, fixing our health care system. You know, one of the arguments that sometimes I get with my fellow progressives [whew--that's interesting--FELLOW progressives], um, and, and, some of these have flashed up in the blog communities on occasion, is this notion that we should function, uh, sort of like Karl Rove, where we identify our core base, we throw 'em red meat, we get a fifty plus one, uh, victory. See, Karl Rove doesn't need a broad consensus, because he doesn't believe in government. If we want to transform the country though, that requires a s-uh-s-uh-sizeable majority."
Th-tha-that's All, Folks!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
classic - his chicks are coming home to roost.
Post a Comment